Tired of identity management headaches?
Tired of identity management headaches?
Experts who take your IAM to the next level
With our implementation consultancy, you don’t just acquire technology: you get access to specialists who tailor Soffid to your environment.
A service to ensure frictionless implementation
From strategic definition to full deployment of Soffid, our team will be with you every step of the way to ensure an agile, secure implementation tailored to your processes.
Discover Soffid SCI
Companies that are starting their IAM journey or would like to migrate from another system, as well as organisations looking for a customised configuration, expert support, and a smooth transition to Soffid.
Manage internal and external users, suppliers, apps and devices from a single unified platform. Soffid seamlessly adapts to any organisational structure and identity source.
Soffid addresses these issues with a unified platform.
From government to banking, through to education and healthcare, our SaaS model adapts to each sector’s regulatory and operational requirements.
Soffid offers you the opportunity to collaborate with the very best technology partners, ensuring your solutions are perfectly tailored to your needs. Choose from among our certified partners and optimise your implementation experience.
Network with our team and see firsthand how Soffid can help you transform your business’s identity management – easily, quickly, and with no obligation!
At Soffid, every conversation can lead to a tailor-made solution
For a narrow SSO-only deployment, an internal team can often manage alone. Once the project spans governance workflows, legacy application connectors, role design, or multi-system provisioning, outside implementation expertise consistently reduces rework and shortens time-to-value, because these are patterns a consulting team has already solved across many environments. The honest test is scope: if your rollout touches more than one or two systems and needs policy design (not just configuration), a scoped consulting engagement usually pays for itself in avoided rework.
The most common causes are skipping a proper discovery phase, underestimating how many legacy or custom applications need bespoke integration work, and not having the right business stakeholders involved early enough to sign off on role and policy decisions. Soffid's implementation methodology front-loads discovery and application inventory before any configuration work starts, and scopes legacy connector work explicitly as its own line item rather than folding it into a generic "integration" estimate that tends to balloon. Projects still run long when an organization can't produce an accurate application and stakeholder inventory up front — that's the single biggest predictor of a schedule slipping.
A thorough discovery phase produces concrete deliverables you can review before implementation starts: an application inventory, a current-state access model, identified data sources (HR systems, directories), and a documented target architecture with sign-off from named stakeholders. If a proposed engagement moves straight to configuration without producing those artifacts, that's the red flag. Ask any consulting partner, including us, to show you what the discovery deliverable looks like before you commit to the full engagement.
A single-capability rollout (for example, SSO across a modest, mostly cloud application portfolio) can land in two to three months. A fuller program spanning governance, legacy connectors, and role design more commonly runs six months to a year for a mid-to-large enterprise. Anything quoted at a few weeks for a multi-capability enterprise rollout is a red flag — it almost always means discovery is being skipped, and the real timeline shows up later as unplanned rework.
IT should own the technical delivery, but role definitions, approval workflows, and what counts as "acceptable access" are business and compliance decisions — projects that leave those choices entirely to IT tend to produce a technically correct system nobody in the business actually uses as intended. Our engagement model requires named business and compliance stakeholders in discovery and sign-off, not just at go-live, specifically because retrofitting their input after the architecture is built is far more expensive than including it from the start.
Implementation and long-term operation are deliberately separate offerings: the consulting engagement covers design, configuration, and go-live, while ongoing operation, monitoring, and tuning are covered under Soffid's enterprise subscription/managed services if you choose that route. Whether you need the latter depends on whether your internal team will have built enough platform expertise during implementation to run it independently — that's a fair thing to assess honestly before the contract ends, not after.
Phased rollout is the default approach we recommend — starting with a limited set of applications or a single business unit lets you validate the access model and connector behavior before scaling to the full environment. It genuinely reduces risk (a config error affects one department, not the whole company) at the cost of slower total time-to-value; it doesn't just delay the same problems, since issues surface and get fixed at small scale where they're cheap to correct, rather than at full scale where they're expensive.
The split varies by deployment size, but professional services typically dominate the first-year cost for any nontrivial rollout, since licensing is usually a predictable per-identity fee while services scale with integration complexity. The costs that balloon unexpectedly are almost always legacy or custom-application connectors that weren't identified during discovery — which is exactly why our methodology scopes connector work explicitly, application by application, before quoting a final services number rather than giving one blended estimate.
